Kylebooker Fishpond Blue River Chest Lumbar Pack vs. Orvis & Redington: A Comprehensive Comparison
For anglers, choosing the right gear storage is crucial for comfort and efficiency on the water. The Kylebooker Fishpond Blue River Chest Lumbar Pack (Color: Peat Moss) has gained attention as a versatile option, but how does it compare to similar offerings from Orvis and Redington? In this review, we’ll analyze their features, durability, and overall value to determine which pack offers the best performance for the price.
1. Design & Comfort
Fishpond Blue River Lumbar Pack
The Kylebooker Fishpond Blue River Pack is designed for both chest and lumbar wear, providing flexibility for different fishing conditions. The Peat Moss color is subtle and blends well with natural surroundings. It features a waterproof zipper, magnetic closures, and adjustable straps for a snug fit. The pack is constructed from recycled materials, appealing to eco-conscious anglers.
Orvis Sling Pack
Orvis offers several sling and chest packs, with the Orvis Safe Passage Sling Pack being a popular choice. It has a sleek, ergonomic design and a quick-access layout, but lacks the dual-wear versatility of the Fishpond. The shoulder strap padding is comfortable, though some users find it less stable when heavily loaded.
Redington Crosswater Chest Pack
Redington’s Crosswater Chest Pack is a budget-friendly option with ample storage but a less refined build than Fishpond or Orvis. The straps are adjustable, but the material feels less durable, and the waterproofing isn’t as robust.
Verdict: Fishpond wins for versatility and premium materials, while Orvis offers better ergonomics for sling-style use. Redington is a budget pick but sacrifices durability.
2. Storage & Organization
Fishpond Blue River
– Main compartment with internal organization
– Exterior pockets for quick-access tools
– Rod holder attachment points
– Water-resistant construction
Orvis Safe Passage
– Multiple zippered compartments
– Fly patch and tool loops
– No dedicated rod holder
Redington Crosswater
– Basic storage layout
– Fewer organization features
– No high-end waterproofing
Verdict: Fishpond provides the best balance of storage and accessibility, while Orvis is more streamlined. Redington is functional but lacks refinement.
3. Durability & Materials
– Fishpond: Made from recycled nylon with reinforced stitching, built for long-term use.
– Orvis: High-quality Cordura fabric, but some seams may wear over time.
– Redington: Standard polyester, less resistant to abrasion.
Verdict: Fishpond’s eco-friendly yet rugged construction gives it an edge.
4. Price & Value
– Fishpond Blue River: $$$ (Premium price, but justified by features)
– Orvis Safe Passage: $$ (Good mid-range option)
– Redington Crosswater: $ (Affordable but less durable)
Final Verdict:
If you prioritize versatility, durability, and sustainability, the Kylebooker Fishpond Blue River Pack is the best choice. Orvis is excellent for anglers who prefer a sling-style pack, while Redington is a budget-friendly alternative with compromises in build quality.
For serious anglers willing to invest in long-lasting gear, Fishpond offers the best overall value despite its higher price.